Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10)
808 Reviews
Exam Code
NCP-MCI-6.10
Exam Name
Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10)
Questions
173 Questions Answers With Explanation
Update Date
February 17,2026
Price
Was :
$81
Today :
$45
Was :
$99
Today :
$55
Was :
$117
Today :
$65
Why Should You Prepare For Your Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) With MyCertsHub?
At MyCertsHub, we go beyond standard study material. Our platform provides authentic Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam Dumps, detailed exam guides, and reliable practice exams that mirror the actual Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) test. Whether you’re targeting Nutanix certifications or expanding your professional portfolio, MyCertsHub gives you the tools to succeed on your first attempt.
Verified NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam Dumps
Every set of exam dumps is carefully reviewed by certified experts to ensure accuracy. For the NCP-MCI-6.10 Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) , you’ll receive updated practice questions designed to reflect real-world exam conditions. This approach saves time, builds confidence, and focuses your preparation on the most important exam areas.
Realistic Test Prep For The NCP-MCI-6.10
You can instantly access downloadable PDFs of NCP-MCI-6.10 practice exams with MyCertsHub. These include authentic practice questions paired with explanations, making our exam guide a complete preparation tool. By testing yourself before exam day, you’ll walk into the Nutanix Exam with confidence.
Smart Learning With Exam Guides
Our structured NCP-MCI-6.10 exam guide focuses on the Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10)'s core topics and question patterns. You will be able to concentrate on what really matters for passing the test rather than wasting time on irrelevant content. Pass the NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam – Guaranteed
We Offer A 100% Money-Back Guarantee On Our Products.
After using MyCertsHub's exam dumps to prepare for the Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) exam, we will issue a full refund. That’s how confident we are in the effectiveness of our study resources.
Try Before You Buy – Free Demo
Still undecided? See for yourself how MyCertsHub has helped thousands of candidates achieve success by downloading a free demo of the NCP-MCI-6.10 exam dumps.
MyCertsHub – Your Trusted Partner For Nutanix Exams
Whether you’re preparing for Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) or any other professional credential, MyCertsHub provides everything you need: exam dumps, practice exams, practice questions, and exam guides. Passing your NCP-MCI-6.10 exam has never been easier thanks to our tried-and-true resources.
Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Sample Question Answers
Question # 1
An administrator is managing a 4-node cluster with different hardware generations:Two G5 Nodes → 2 CPUs (12 cores), 1 SSD (1.92 TB), 2 HDDs (4 TB).
Two G7 Nodes → 2 CPUs (16 cores), 2 SSDs (1.92 TB), 4 HDDs (4 TB).
The cluster will be decommissioned from production and used for Disaster Recovery (DR) purposes
with an RPO of 1 hour.
What is the best approach when replacing G5 nodes without impacting performance?
New node must have at least 2 SSDs. New node must be G7 or G8. New node must have 2 CPUs with 12 cores. New node must be hybrid.
Answer: A Explanation: For optimal Disaster Recovery performance, new nodes must match or exceed the storage
performance of existing nodes.
Option A (New node must have at least 2 SSDs) is correct: Since the G7 nodes have two SSDs, replacing G5 nodes with at least 2 SSDs ensures consistent SSD
cache and performance.
Option B is incorrect:
G7 or G8 nodes may help, but storage performance is more critical for DR.
Option C is incorrect:
CPU core count does not impact DR storage performance as much as SSD capacity.
Option D is incorrect:
Hybrid nodes are already in use, but SSDs must match for performance balance.
Reference:
Nutanix Hardware Guide → Choosing Nodes for Hybrid and DR Clusters
Nutanix KB → Balancing Storage Across Different Hardware Generations
Question # 2
How can a VM or Volume Group (VG) be associated with a Storage Policy?
Assign the Storage Policy directly on the VM or VG. Assign the VM or VG directly to the Storage Policy. Migrate the VM or VG to the Storage Container assigned to the Storage Policy. Assign the VM or VG to the same Category as the Storage Policy.
Answer: D Explanation: Storage Policies in Nutanix are applied through Categories, allowing policy-based automation and
enforcement. Option D (Assign the VM or VG to the same Category as the Storage Policy) is correct:
Nutanix applies Storage Policies based on VM Categories, enabling flexibility in policy enforcement.
Option A is incorrect:
Storage Policies are not directly assigned at the VM or VG level”they apply through Categories.
Option B is incorrect:
Policies must be assigned to Categories, not directly to individual VMs/VGs.
Option C is incorrect:
Migrating to a storage container does not automatically apply a Storage Policy.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Management Guide → Using Categories for Policy-Based Storage Management
Nutanix KB → Best Practices for Applying Storage Policies to VMs
Question # 3
An administrator wants to clean up inactive VMs using VM Efficiency in Nutanix. The business requires that VMs must be inactive for 120 days before deletion.A Playbook was created to delete Dead and Zombie VMs with a 99-day wait period after they are
marked inactive.
How long will have passed before these VMs are deleted? (Choose two.)
For Dead VMs, the wait before deletion is 120 days. For Zombie VMs, the wait before deletion is 129 days. For Dead VMs, the wait before deletion is 129 days. For Zombie VMs, the wait before deletion is 120 days.
Answer: B, C Explanation: Dead VMs and Zombie VMs are different classifications of inactive VMs in Nutanix, and their deletion
timelines depend on Playbook configuration.
Dead VMs → Considered inactive after 30 days, then must wait 99 more days before deletion.
Total time: 30 + 99 = 129 days.
(Option C is correct).
Zombie VMs → Considered inactive after 30 days, then must wait 99 more days before deletion.
Total time: 30 + 99 = 129 days.
(Option B is correct).
Reference:
Nutanix Prism Central Guide → Using VM Efficiency to Manage Inactive VMs
Nutanix KB → Configuring Playbooks for Automatic VM Cleanup
Question # 4
An administrator observes an alert in Prism for a hybrid SSD/HDD cluster: "Storage Pool SSD utilization consistently above 75%."What is the potential impact of this condition?
The cluster is unable to sustain an SSD disk failure. The cluster may be nearly out of storage for metadata. The cluster is at risk of entering a read-only state. Average I/O latency in the cluster may increase.
Answer: D Explanation: High SSD utilization in a hybrid cluster can lead to increased I/O latency as new writes may spill over
to HDDs, reducing overall performance.
Option D (Average I/O latency in the cluster may increase) is correct:
If SSD usage is above 75%, data tiering shifts to slower HDDs, increasing latency.
Option A is incorrect:
SSD failures are managed via redundancy policies (RF2/RF3), and high utilization does not impact
failure handling.
Option B is incorrect:
Metadata is stored separately, and high SSD usage does not mean metadata is at risk. Option C is incorrect:
Clusters do not go into read-only mode due to high SSD utilization”they simply experience
performance degradation.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Performance Guide → SSD Tiering and Performance Management
Nutanix KB → Managing High SSD Utilization in Hybrid Clusters
Question # 5
Which two actions occur by default on a node that is placed in Maintenance Mode? (Choose two.)
Non-migratable VMs are powered off and restarted on other hosts in the cluster. All eligible VMs on the host are migrated to other hosts in the cluster. All eligible VMs on the host are powered off.
Answer: B, D Explanation: When a node is placed into Maintenance Mode, Nutanix follows a structured process to ensure
service continuity and data integrity. Option B (All eligible VMs on the host are migrated to other hosts) is correct: Live Migration automatically moves VMs to other hosts to avoid downtime.
This ensures workloads remain operational during maintenance.
Option D (Non-migratable VMs are powered off) is correct:
Some VMs, such as those using GPU pass-through or local storage dependencies, cannot be livemigrated.
These VMs must be powered off before placing the host into Maintenance Mode.
Option A is incorrect:
Non-migratable VMs are not automatically restarted on other hosts”they remain powered off until
manually restarted.
Option C is incorrect:
Eligible VMs are live-migrated, not powered off.
Reference:
Nutanix AHV Best Practices → Understanding Maintenance Mode Behavior
Nutanix KB → VM Migration and Power-Off Scenarios in Maintenance Mode
Question # 6
An administrator receives an alert in Prism stating: "Storage container on cluster will run out of storage resources inapproximately 1 day." However, the cluster has plenty of available space remaining.
What configuration setting is causing the container to run out of space while the cluster has space
remaining?
Advertised Capacity is set too low. Reserved Capacity is set too high. Compression is set too low. Replication Factor is set too high.
Answer: B Explanation: Reserved Capacity settings define how much storage is exclusively allocated for a specific container.
Option B (Reserved Capacity is too high) is correct:
If too much space is reserved for a container, it can report "out of space" while the cluster still has
free capacity.
Options A, C, and D are incorrect:
Advertised Capacity, Compression, and RF settings do not directly cause storage exhaustion unless
misconfigured with Reserved Capacity.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Best Practices → Configuring Reserved and Advertised Capacity
Nutanix KB → Troubleshooting Storage Container Out-of-Space Alerts
Question # 7
An administrator is configuring Nutanix Disaster Recovery (DR) for a cross-hypervisor setup (ESXi to AHV) but finds that guest VMs do not recover properly at the DR location.What is required for a successful cross-hypervisor DR event?
Utilize delta disks. Deploy Legacy BIOS boot on hosts within the cluster. Use raw device mappings. Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) must be installed on source guest VMs.
Answer: D Explanation: For cross-hypervisor DR failover (e.g., ESXi to AHV), Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) must be installed on
VMs to ensure proper configuration and recovery.
Option D (NGT must be installed on source guest VMs) is correct:
NGT ensures correct reconfiguration of VM devices and networking settings during failover.
It handles disk and driver reassignments between ESXi and AHV.
Option A (Utilize delta disks) is incorrect:
Delta disks are used in snapshot optimization, not DR failover.
Option B (Deploy Legacy BIOS boot) is incorrect:
AHV prefers UEFI boot mode, and Legacy BIOS is not a requirement.
Option C (Use raw device mappings) is incorrect:
RDMs are VMware-specific and are not used in AHV failover scenarios.
Reference:
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Cross-Hypervisor Failover Best Practices
Nutanix KB → Ensuring VM Compatibility During ESXi to AHV DR
Question # 8
An administrator needs to create a single chart showing multiple storage bandwidth metrics a VM is
consuming.Which type of chart should the administrator create?
Metric Chart Entity Chart Hypervisor Performance Chart VM Summary Chart
Answer: B Explanation: Entity Charts in Nutanix Prism Central allow multiple metrics from a single entity (e.g., VM, storage
container) to be displayed on a single graph.
Option B (Entity Chart) is correct:
This allows the administrator to track multiple performance metrics (e.g., read/write bandwidth, IOPS) for a specific VM.
Option A (Metric Chart) is incorrect:
Metric Charts track a single metric across multiple entities, which does not meet the requirement of
displaying multiple metrics for a single VM.
Option C (Hypervisor Performance Chart) is incorrect:
Hypervisor Performance Charts track host-level metrics, not VM-specific bandwidth metrics.
Option D (VM Summary Chart) is incorrect:
VM Summary Charts only provide an overview and do not support custom multi-metric tracking.
Reference:
Nutanix Prism Central Guide → Entity vs. Metric Charts for Performance Analysis
Nutanix KB → Creating Custom Charts in Prism Central
Question # 9
An administrator needs to enable Windows Defender Credential Guard to comply with company
policy.The new VM configurations include:Legacy BIOS
4 vCPUs
8 GB RAM
Windows Server 2019
What must be changed in order to properly enable Windows Defender Credential Guard?
Update vCPU to 8. Enable UEFI with Secure Boot. Use Windows Server 2022. Update Memory to 16GB.
Answer: B Explanation: Windows Defender Credential Guard requires UEFI firmware and Secure Boot to function properly.
Option B (Enable UEFI with Secure Boot) is correct:
Credential Guard requires a UEFI-based boot mode rather than Legacy BIOS.
Secure Boot ensures only trusted OS components load, reducing attack surface for credential theft.
Option A (Update vCPU to 8) is incorrect:
Increasing vCPUs does not impact Credential Guard compatibility.
Option C (Use Windows Server 2022) is incorrect:
Windows Server 2019 supports Credential Guard; upgrading to 2022 is not required.
Option D (Update Memory to 16GB) is incorrect:
Credential Guard has no minimum RAM requirement beyond general OS needs.
Reference:
Microsoft Docs → Requirements for Windows Defender Credential Guard
Nutanix AHV VM Management Guide → Enabling Secure Boot & UEFI for Windows VMs
Question # 10
An administrator is protecting an application and its data stored on Volume Groups using Protection
Domains.During failover tests, all application VMs restore successfully, but the application data is completely
missing.How can the Protection Domain configuration be adjusted to avoid this issue in the future? (Choose
two.)
Select the "Auto protect related entities" checkbox. Manually add Volume Groups to Protected Entities. Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain. Use application-consistent snapshots.
Answer: A, B Explanation: Protection Domains (PDs) in Nutanix ensure that entire applications and their associated data are
protected during failover. However, Volume Groups (VGs) are not automatically included unless
explicitly configured.
Option A (Select "Auto protect related entities") is correct:
This setting ensures that associated Volume Groups, networks, and other dependencies are included
in the Protection Domain automatically.
Without enabling this, only the VM itself would be protected, leading to missing application data
upon failover.
Option B (Manually add Volume Groups to Protected Entities) is correct:
If "Auto protect related entities" is not enabled, the administrator must manually add Volume
Groups to the Protection Domain.
This ensures that both VMs and their attached Volume Groups are replicated and recovered together.
Option C (Place Volume Groups in a separate Protection Domain) is incorrect:
Separating Volume Groups into a different PD does not guarantee they failover together with VMs.
It is best practice to keep related VMs and Volume Groups in the same PD.
Option D (Use application-consistent snapshots) is incorrect:
While application-consistent snapshots improve data integrity, they do not fix missing Volume
Groups in failover scenarios.
Reference:
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Protection Domain Configuration and Volume Groups
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Protection Domain Configuration and Volume Groups
Question # 11
An administrator notices high CPU usage on a VM and wants to determine whether adding more
vCPUs would improve performance.Which two metrics should be analyzed to make this decision? (Choose two.)
VM CPU Ready Time VM CPU Usage Host CPU Usage Host Memory Swap Out Rate
Answer: A, B Explanation: When diagnosing CPU performance issues, CPU Ready Time and CPU Usage are the key indicators of
whether more vCPUs are needed.
Option A (VM CPU Ready Time) is correct:
High CPU Ready Time means the VM is waiting for CPU resources, indicating CPU contention.
Option B (VM CPU Usage) is correct:
If CPU usage is consistently high, adding more vCPUs may improve performance.
Option C (Host CPU Usage) is incorrect:
Host-wide CPU usage does not indicate whether a specific VM needs more vCPUs.
Option D (Host Memory Swap Out Rate) is incorrect:
Memory swapping affects RAM performance, not CPU allocation.
Reference:
Nutanix Prism Central Guide → Analyzing VM CPU Performance
Nutanix KB → Understanding CPU Ready Time and VM Performance
Question # 12
What guest customization options are available when creating a VM template?
Sysprep, Cloud-init, Custom Script, Guided Script Bash, Powershell Python, YAML None, guest customization is not supported in Nutanix templates.
Answer: A Explanation: Guest customization options allow administrators to automate OS configuration during VM
deployment from a template.
Option A (Sysprep, Cloud-init, Custom Script, Guided Script) is correct:
Sysprep (for Windows) and Cloud-init (for Linux) enable custom OS configurations.
Custom Scripts can be used for advanced automation.
Options B and C are incorrect:
Bash, Powershell, Python, and YAML can be used in automation, but they are not guest
customization options in VM templates.
Option D is incorrect:
Guest customization is fully supported in Nutanix templates.
Reference: Nutanix VM Deployment Guide → Using Cloud-Init and Sysprep for Guest Customization
Nutanix KB → Automating VM Deployments with Guest Customization
Question # 13
An administrator has configured AHV Metro Availability with Witness and is testing failover
scenarios.During testing, the administrator disconnects the primary and recovery clusters but Prism Centralremains connected to the recovery site.
What are two expected system behaviors? (Choose two.)
Guest VM I/O operations pause (freeze) until connectivity is restored. Guest VM I/O operations pause (freeze) until connectivity between Prism Central and the primary
site is restored. Guest VMs failover automatically to the recovery cluster. Guest VMs continue to run on the primary cluster.
Answer: A, C Explanation: When connectivity between Metro clusters is lost, Nutanix Metro Availability ensures data integrity
using Witness for automatic failover.
Option A (Guest VM I/O operations pause until connectivity is restored) is correct:
Metro Availability enforces data consistency, so I/O operations pause until failover is confirmed.
Option C (Guest VMs failover automatically to the recovery cluster) is correct:
The Witness VM detects the failure and initiates an automatic failover to the secondary cluster.
Option B is incorrect:
Prism Central does not control VM failover in Metro Availability.
Option D is incorrect:
The primary cluster is unreachable, so VMs cannot continue running there.
Reference:
Nutanix Metro Availability Guide → How Witness Handles Failover Scenarios
Nutanix KB → I/O Freezing and Failover Behavior in Metro Clusters
Question # 14
What is supported for creating a VM Template in Nutanix?
VM is protected by Protection Domain-based DR VM is an agent or a Prism Central VM. VM has disks located on RF2 containers. VM runs on the ESXi hypervisor.
Answer: C Explanation: VM templates in Nutanix are supported only when the VMs disks reside on storage containers
configured with Replication Factor 2 (RF2) or higher.
Option C (VM has disks on RF2 containers) is correct:
VM templates require a minimum RF2 for fault tolerance.
RF1 containers do not meet Nutanix best practices for VM templates.
Option A is incorrect:
VMs protected by Protection Domains can be cloned, but this is different from creating a VM
template.
Option B is incorrect:
Agent VMs (e.g., Witness VMs) or Prism Central cannot be used as VM templates.
Option D is incorrect:
Nutanix VM templates are natively supported on AHV, not ESXi.
Reference: Nutanix VM Management Guide → Creating and Managing VM Templates
Nutanix KB → Storage Requirements for VM Templates
Question # 15
An administrator needs to perform an LCM upgrade on an AHV host with GPUs.What additional step is required before upgrading the host?
Create an agent VM on each host that has GPU drivers installed. Run LCM in dark site mode so it can update AHV independently. Use Direct Uploads to upload appropriate driver bundles. Update NCC to the latest version and re-run Inventory.
Answer: C Explanation: Upgrading an AHV host with GPUs requires that the correct GPU drivers be manually uploaded toLCM, as GPU firmware is not updated automatically.
Option C (Use Direct Uploads to upload appropriate driver bundles) is correct:
LCM does not automatically fetch GPU drivers.
The administrator must download and manually upload the appropriate firmware bundle before
upgrading.
Option A is incorrect:
Agent VMs are not required for GPU updates.
Option B is incorrect:
Running LCM in dark site mode does not impact GPU firmware updates.
Option D is incorrect:
Updating NCC is a best practice but does not resolve GPU driver issues.
Reference:
Nutanix LCM Guide → Manually Uploading GPU Firmware Bundles
Nutanix KB → Updating AHV Hosts with GPUs
Question # 16
An administrator is experiencing storage performance issues on a Windows Server 2019 VM with the
following configuration:vCPU: 1VRAM: 8 GB
vSCSI: VirtIO SCSI Controller
vDisk: 2 (100 GB, 250 GB)
vNIC: VirtIO Fast Ethernet
The AHV cluster is healthy, and other Windows VMs are performing well.
Which configuration change should be reviewed to enhance VM performance?
Add a second virtual storage controller (vSCSI). Enable Balance-TCP on bridge (br0). Increase Controller VM (CVM) resources. Increase the VMs number of vCPUs.
Answer: D Explanation: A single vCPU is likely causing a bottleneck, limiting the VMs ability to process I/O requests
efficiently. Option D (Increase the VMs number of vCPUs) is correct:
Windows requires sufficient CPU resources to handle disk and network operations.
Adding more vCPUs allows the VM to process more I/O operations simultaneously, improving
performance. Option A is incorrect: Additional vSCSI controllers are only useful for very high disk I/O workloads.
Option B is incorrect:
Balance-TCP applies to network traffic, not storage performance.
Option C is incorrect:
CVM resources do not directly affect individual VM performance.
Reference:
Nutanix AHV Performance Tuning Guide
Nutanix KB → Optimizing Windows VM Performance on AHV
Question # 17
Which update in LCM can an administrator apply on a per-node basis?
AOS BMC NCC AHV
Answer: B Explanation: BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) updates can be applied per-node in Nutanix LCM, unlike
AOS or AHV, which require cluster-wide upgrades. Option B (BMC) is correct:
BMC firmware controls remote management and power cycling of individual nodes.
Updating BMC does not impact the entire cluster and can be done per node.
Option A (AOS) is incorrect:
AOS upgrades affect the entire cluster and require cluster-wide consistency.
Option C (NCC) is incorrect:
NCC updates apply across all nodes simultaneously, ensuring uniformity in checks.
Option D (AHV) is incorrect:
AHV updates require coordinated upgrades across hosts to maintain VM availability.
Reference:
Nutanix LCM User Guide → Per-Node Firmware Updates
Nutanix KB → How to Upgrade BMC Using LCM
Question # 18
An administrator using a dark site deployment for LCM is attempting to upgrade to the latest BIOS.After completing an inventory scan, the administrator does not see the expected BIOS version
available for upgrade.What is the most likely reason the latest BIOS is not shown?
AOS needs to be upgraded first. The latest compatibility bundle has not been uploaded. The BMC version needs to be upgraded first. The dark site webserver is not accessible.
Answer: B Explanation: In a dark site deployment, LCM does not automatically fetch updates from the internet. The
administrator must manually upload compatibility bundles.
Option B (The latest compatibility bundle has not been uploaded) is correct:
The compatibility bundle contains firmware mappings, allowing LCM to detect the correct BIOS
version.
Option A is incorrect:
AOS does not need to be upgraded first for a BIOS update.
Option C is incorrect:
The BMC firmware does not always need updating before BIOS updates.
Option D is incorrect:
In a dark site deployment, LCM does not rely on an internet connection, so webserver access is not
required.
Reference:
Nutanix LCM Guide → Using Compatibility Bundles in Dark Sites
Nutanix KB → Troubleshooting Firmware Updates in Dark Site Deployments
Question # 19
In a five-node cluster, an administrator noticed that three VMs are consuming too many resources on
a single host.Acropolis Dynamic Scheduling (ADS) is not able to migrate these VMs.
What is the most likely reason preventing ADS from migrating these VMs?
VMs use a Volume Group. VMs use GPU pass-through. VM-VM anti-affinity policy is set. VMs use external Network Attached Storage.
Answer: B Explanation: VMs using GPU pass-through cannot be live-migrated because they are directly tied to a physical
GPU on a specific host.
Option B (VMs use GPU pass-through) is correct:
Pass-through devices (such as GPUs) are directly assigned to VMs, making migration impossible
unless the VM is powered off first.
Option A (VMs use a Volume Group) is incorrect:
Volume Groups support live migration unless they are configured incorrectly.
Option C (VM-VM anti-affinity) is incorrect:
Anti-affinity rules prevent two specific VMs from running together, but do not prevent migration.
Option D (VMs use external NAS) is incorrect:
Using NAS does not block VM migration, as Nutanix supports shared storage across hosts.
Reference:
Nutanix AHV Best Practices → GPU Pass-through and VM Migration Limitations
Nutanix KB → Why Can't I Live Migrate a VM with GPU Passthrough?
Question # 20
An administrator needs to create a storage container for VM disks. The container must meet the
following conditions:10 GiB of the total allocated space must not be used by other containers.The container must have a maximum storage capacity of 500 GiB.
What settings should the administrator configure while creating the storage container?
Set Advertised Capacity to 10 GiB and Reserved Capacity to 500 GiB. Set Advertised Capacity to 10 GiB. Set Reserved Capacity to 500 GiB. Set Reserved Capacity to 10 GiB and Advertised Capacity to 500 GiB.
Answer: D Explanation: Nutanix storage containers allow administrators to configure capacity reservations and advertised
limits for better resource management.
Option D (Set Reserved Capacity to 10 GiB and Advertised Capacity to 500 GiB) is correct:
Reserved Capacity ensures that 10 GiB is always available for this container and not consumed by
other containers. Advertised Capacity defines a logical limit of 500 GiB to prevent over-allocation.
Option A is incorrect:
Advertised Capacity of 10 GiB is too low and does not match the requirement of a 500 GiB storage
container. Option B is incorrect:
Only setting Advertised Capacity does not guarantee Reserved Capacity, meaning other containers
could consume the reserved space.
Option C is incorrect: Setting only Reserved Capacity does not enforce an upper limit, which could lead to
overprovisioning.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Management Guide → Understanding Storage Container Settings
Nutanix KB → Advertised vs. Reserved Capacity in Storage Containers
Question # 21
Which two URLs must be accessible from a Connected Sites Controller VMs to allow Life CycleManager (LCM) to download software updates?
Answer: A, C Explanation: LCM (Life Cycle Manager) fetches software updates from Nutanixs repositories, requiring access to
specific URLs. Option A (download.nutanix.com) is correct: This domain hosts all software update files for AOS, AHV, and other Nutanix components.
Option C (release-api.nutanix.com) is correct:
This domain is used for LCM to fetch update metadata and check for new versions.
Option B (mynutanix.com) is incorrect:
This domain is used for account management, not LCM updates.
Option D (portal.nutanix.com) is incorrect:
The Nutanix support portal is not used for automated LCM updates.
Reference:
Nutanix LCM Guide → Firewall Rules for LCM Connectivity
Nutanix KB → Troubleshooting LCM Update Failures
Question # 22
An administrator needs to optimize a VMs storage by leveraging compression features.The VMs
vDisks are currently stored in a default storage container with no optimizations enabled.How should the administrator proceed?
Migrate vDisks to the Production storage container. Recreate the VM in the Production storage container and copy data. Migrate the VM to the Production storage container. Recreate the vDisk in the Production storage container and copy data.
Answer: A Explanation: Moving vDisks to a storage container with compression enabled ensures better data efficiency
without downtime. Option A (Migrate vDisks) is correct:
vDisk migration is non-disruptive and allows compression settings to be applied dynamically.
Option B (Recreate the VM) is incorrect:
Rebuilding the VM is unnecessary and would cause downtime.
Option C (Migrate the VM) is incorrect:
VM migration does not guarantee that only vDisks move, and it may disrupt performance.
Option D (Recreate vDisk) is incorrect:
This method is manual and time-consuming, while Nutanix provides an automated approach.
Reference:
Nutanix Storage Optimization Guide → Enabling Compression on Existing vDisks
Nutanix KB → Migrate vDisks Between Storage Containers for Optimization
Question # 23
A Disaster Recovery administrator has set up a Protection Policy for 50 workloads, all configured
similarly.The RPO is 60 minutes with a specified retention of 10 local copies, 5 remote copies, and crash
consistency.After activation, recovery points are not appearing at the DR site, even though they are visible on the
production side.What is the most likely issue?
Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT) is not installed on the source VMs. Windows updates need to be applied to all affected VMs. The storage container name on the DR cluster does not match the production cluster. The storage container RF factor does not match in both clusters.
Answer: C Explanation: For Disaster Recovery to function correctly, the source and destination storage containers must have
identical names.
Option C (Storage container name mismatch) is correct:
If the storage container name at the DR site does not match, Nutanix cannot map snapshots and
replication data. This causes failover operations to fail, even though data exists.
Option A (NGT not installed) is incorrect:
NGT is needed for application-consistent snapshots, but not required for crash-consistent snapshots.
Option B (Windows updates) is incorrect:
OS updates do not affect replication availability.
Option D (Storage RF factor mismatch) is incorrect:
Replication works across different RF factors, but performance may vary.
Reference:
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Requirements for Remote Replication
Nutanix KB → Storage Container Mapping for Protection Domains
Question # 24
An administrator attempted to enable Data-in-Transit Encryption on a Scale-Out Prism Central clusterto encrypt service-level traffic between nodes. However, the feature did not work correctly due to a
firewall restriction.
Which CVM-specific port should be allowed through the firewall for Data-in-Transit Encryption?
2009 2010 2020 9440
Answer: A Explanation: Data-in-Transit Encryption in Nutanix requires inter-node communication over specific CVM ports.
Option A (Port 2009) is correct:
Port 2009 is used for Data-in-Transit Encryption between Nutanix CVMs.
Firewall rules must allow traffic on this port to enable secure encrypted communication.
Option B (Port 2010) is incorrect:
Port 2010 is used for CVM-to-CVM communication but does not handle encryption.
Option C (Port 2020) is incorrect:
This port is used for Acropolis File Services (AFS), not encryption.
Option D (Port 9440) is incorrect:
Port 9440 is used for Prism Central web access, not internal CVM encryption.
Reference: Nutanix Security Guide → Data-at-Rest vs. Data-in-Transit Encryption
Nutanix KB → Firewall Port Requirements for Secure Cluster Communication
Question # 25
An administrator is configuring a replication schedule on multiple remote locations deployed using a
single-node cluster. The goal is to achieve the lowest possible RPO (Recovery Point Objective).How should the administrator configure the replication schedule?
Configure NearSync replication. Configure a schedule for 16 minutes up to 59 minutes. Configure Async replication. Configure a schedule for 1 minute up to 15 minutes.
Answer: D Explanation: Nutanix NearSync replication provides the lowest RPO (as low as 1 minute) and is the best option for
minimizing data loss in DR scenarios.
Option D (Configure a schedule for 1 minute up to 15 minutes) is correct:
NearSync allows an RPO as low as 1 minute, providing near-continuous data protection.
This is ideal for mission-critical applications where minimal data loss is required.
Option A (Configure NearSync) is incorrect: While NearSync is the best choice, just enabling it is not enough”the schedule must be set to 1-15
minutes.
Option B (16 to 59 minutes) is incorrect:
NearSync operates within a 1-15 minute range. If set above 15 minutes, it defaults to Async
replication. Option C (Async replication) is incorrect:
Async replication typically has an RPO of 1 hour or more, which does not meet the lowest RPO
requirement. Reference:
Nutanix Protection Policies Guide → NearSync vs. Async Replication
Nutanix Bible → RPO and RTO in Disaster Recovery
Nutanix KB → Configuring NearSync Replication for Single-Node Clusters
Feedback That Matters: Reviews of Our Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Dumps
